Reviews: Learning Object + Annotated Bibliography

For the activity 3 - Reviews, professor Morten suggest that we consider to review one annotated bibliography and one learning object (instead of two learning objects). So I'll review the Learning Object made by Helena and the Annotated Bibliography shared by Sonia valente.

Helena made an LO very interesting and appealing.
If anyone had doubts about getting or becoming a learning partner, after watching this LO will change his/her mind.
With a personal presentation, students can show the personal side (within limits defined by themselves), and this can be a factor for promoting transparency and consequently cooperation.
In this LO Helena shows the advantages of becoming or getting a learning partner. From my point of view one of the most important is the possibility of having someone, chosen by us, and with whom we can share doubts, thoughts, knowledge, ...
The incorporation of the video gives a special touch.
I also liked the suggestions for possible readings to deepen knowledge.

----------------------------

I'll review the annotated bibliography that Sónia Valente posted on her blog.

Sonia’s annotated bibliography is a list of sites, documents and papers concerned with “Transparency in online Education”.

In each of these items is presented a citation from the text. Since the purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance and accuracy of the sources cited, I think Sonia should have explored these texts, presenting the author's point of view and adding some comments of her own.

The author, date and paper’s title are identified and the title it’s linked to the site of the paper. However, Sonia doesn’t indicate the retrieved date.

I also suggest that sonia organize the annotated bibliography alphabetically or by other criteria explained in the introduction.